What Will SCORM 2.0 Look Like?">What Will SCORM 2.0 Look Like?
It’s been a day. I’d wax on about this, but I’m kinda sleepy.
Needless to say, :
- Fluid Content Aggregation
- Integration of KM and Learning
- Adaptive Ongoing Assessment
- Collaborative Learning and Assessment
- Content Tracking
- Work-related Software Application
I plan to comment on all of these (I’ve at 4/6 tonight). What I need YOU to do is provide some comments of your own (preferably on the LETSI site, but I’ll take your thoughts here — whatever makes you comfy). The ten most compelling scenarios are going to be the first ones out of the gate that the SCORM 2.0 Architecture and Business groups will develop to.
If you want to have a direct hand in shaping what organizational learning looks like over the next 5-10 years, I know it sounds too simplistic to be true but…. this is your chance. This list is going to be vetted and refined in the next two weeks, and then we roll on. It’s an exciting time to weigh in and there’s a lot of talented brain power behind this effort.
As always, you are more than welcome to go to the LETSI site without logging in and read what’s there. If you want to comment on the LETSI.org site, you need to be registered and logged in.
Technorati Tags: scorm2.0, content, aggregation, km, learning, collaboration, assessment, content, tracking, business applications, letsi, scorm, sap
Good stuff. I’m especially interested in integrating KM and Learning, something that seems so logical but nobody is thinking about (other than yours truly) at my organization, and at many other organizations.
i pledge to at some point possibly give it a try. maybe.
(ahem)
Do or Do Not, dude.
There is no try.
Did I ever mention one of my stepkids talks like Yoda? Stuff like “The thing you wanted to buy, is that?” I don’t think he even realizes it.
Anyway, I seriously intend to take a stab at the LETSI stuff, it’s just that I have a preeeetty full plate ATM. But by all means, feel free to pester me (and others)!
I’m only teasing you, brother. You get to it when you can…
But get to it soon, while your insights have the most impact!
Still reading LETSI updates…my biggest frustration is the linear approach to everything. Looks like so many other system description documents and diagrams I’ve read of late. Guess I need to make a SCORM map. Then the architecture group can realign everything.
Lisa,
That’s a good criticism and I’ll take a stab at addressing it.
People are used to telling stories that have a linear thread — beginning, middle and end. If you remember in the LET room, that first day we had a really difficult time coming together on one use case that we all seemed to want to project our own needs onto. Taking it a step further back, we then went about telling our “stories” of what we want learning to look like. The very fact that they were narratives seems to almost guarantee that the scenarios would be linear in fashion.
Now what’s interesting to me as I read through them is how we actually keep touching on some of the same themes. How some key themes keep emerging is almost a matrix — which definitely merits a mapping of what themes emerge and where.
But if you want to build a nuclear/atomic map (stem/nodes) – now I’m just going all nerdy on you — I’d be happy to help.
Long story short — I agree that lots of the narrative examples here are linear, but they translate well to people who aren’t really into “SCORM” so the non-techies that relate to the space can understand what we want to do with learning technology over the next 5-10 years.
The situations themselves aren’t linear, but their stories definitely are.